Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 17(8): 612-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25895906

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The cure rate in Hodgkin lymphoma is high, but the response along with treatment is still unpredictable and highly variable among patients. Detecting those patients who do not respond to treatment at early stages could bring improvements in their treatment. This research tries to identify the main biological prognostic variables currently gathered at diagnosis and design a simple machine learning methodology to help physicians improve the treatment response assessment. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of the response to treatment of a cohort of 263 Caucasians who were diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma in Asturias (Spain). For that purpose, we used a list of 35 clinical and biological variables that are currently measured at diagnosis before any treatment begins. To establish the list of most discriminatory prognostic variables for treatment response, we designed a machine learning approach based on two different feature selection methods (Fisher's ratio and maximum percentile distance) and backwards recursive feature elimination using a nearest-neighbor classifier (k-NN). The weights of the k-NN classifier were optimized using different terms of the confusion matrix (true- and false-positive rates) to minimize risk in the decisions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that the optimum strategy to predict treatment response in Hodgkin lymphoma consists in solving two different binary classification problems, discriminating first if the patient is in progressive disease; if not, then discerning among complete and partial remission. Serum ferritin turned to be the most discriminatory variable in predicting treatment response, followed by alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase. The importance of these prognostic variables suggests a close relationship between inflammation, iron overload, liver damage and the extension of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/epidemiología , Sobrecarga de Hierro/epidemiología , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vinblastina/uso terapéutico
2.
Rev Clin Esp ; 208(6): 288-94, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18620653

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: How to identify monoclonal gammopathies of undeterminated significance (MGUS) at risk for progression has been studied for the last years. AIMS: To study the incidence of MGUS in a region with 300,000 inhabitants and factors which associate with a) monoclonal gammopathy disappearance (transient MGUS) b) evolution to malignant gammopathy. METHODS: Study of 618 MGUS. RESULTS: Incidence: 30/40 new cases a year with increase to 70 cases a years in the latest years of study. Age and gender: 71,4 y (32-100), male/female ratio 1.4. Associated pathology: infection 328, heart diseases 249, rheumatic diseases 211, liver diseases 108, cancer 80, neuropathy 43. Monoclonal proteins: IgG 407, IgM 78, IgD 2, biclonal 16, triclonal 1; no heavy chain 21, light chain Kappa 389. Variables (mean): monoclonal component: 14 g/l, ESR 32,5, bone marrow: 5,9% plasma cells beta2-microglobulin: 2,59 mg/l, albumin: 3,1g/l, bone survey: normal 39,5%. Evolution: transient MGUS 20 cases. Time to disappearance 2,6 months (1,4-4,6). Evolution to malignant gammopathy 24 cases, time to progression 3 years (IC 1,82-4,3). RESULTS: Several factors were associatedç with malignant transformation: heavy chain IgA (p < 0,002), ESR (p < 0,001), age < 70 (p < 0,05), bone marrow percentage of plasma cells (p < 0,002) y ostheoporosis (p < 0,005). A MGUS follow up model is suggested.


Asunto(s)
Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Paraproteinemias/epidemiología , Paraproteinemias/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 208(6): 288-294, jun. 2008. ilus, tab
Artículo en Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-66301

RESUMEN

Introducción. La identificación de las gammapatíasmonoclonales de significado incierto (GMSI) conriesgo elevado de progresión se viene estudiandoen los últimos años.Objetivos. Evaluar la incidencia de las GMSI enun área de 300.000 habitantes y sus factoresasociados: la desaparición del componentemonoclonal (CM), gammapatías transitorias (GMT) ysu evolución a gammapatías malignas (GMM).Métodos. Estudio de 618 GMSI.Resultados. Incidencia: 30-40 casos nuevos/año, conun incremento en los últimos años de hasta 70 casospor año. Edad y sexo: 71,4 años (32-100); relaciónH/F 1,4. Patología asociada: infecciosa 328,cardiológica 249, reumatoidea 211, hepática 108,neoplasia 80 y neuropatía 43. Características del CM:IgG 407, IgA 93, IgM 78, IgD 2, biclonales 16,triclonal 1 y ninguna cadena pesada 21. Cadenasligeras: kappa 389 casos. Variables (media): CM 14 g/l, VSG 32,5 mm, MO porcentaje de células plasmáticas 5,9%, ß2-microglobulina 2,59 mg/l, albúmina 3,1 g/l, serie ósea normal 39,5%. Evolución: GMT 20 casos. Tiempo medio de desaparición 2,6meses (1,4-4,6), GM transformadas a GMM 24 casosTiempo medio de progresión 3 años (IC 1,82-4,3).Resultados. Se identifican como factoresasociados a transformación a GMM: cadena pesadaIgA (p < 0,002), VSG (p < 0,001), edad < 70 años(p < 0,05), porcentaje de CP (p < 0,002) yosteoporosis (p < 0,005). Se propone un modelo de seguimiento de GMSI


Introduction. How to identify monoclonalgammopathies of undeterminated significance(MGUS) at risk for progression has been studied forthe last years. Aims. To study the incidence ofMGUS in a region with 300,000 inhabitants andfactors which associate with a) monoclonalgammopathy disappearance (transient MGUS)b) evolution to malignant gammopathy.Methods. Study of 618 MGUS.Results. Incidence: 30/40 new cases a year withincrease to 70 cases a years in the latest years ofstudy. Age and gender: 71,4 y (32-100),male/female ratio 1.4. Associated pathology:infection 328, heart diseases 249, rheumaticdiseases 211, liver diseases 108, cancer 80,neuropathy 43. Monoclonal proteins: IgG 407,IgM 78, IgD 2, biclonal 16, triclonal 1; no heavychain 21, light chain Kappa 389. Variables (mean):monoclonal component: 14 g/l, ESR 32,5, bonemarrow: 5,9% plasma cells ß2-microglobulin: 2,59 mg/l, albumin: 3,1g/l, bone survey: normal 39,5%. Evolution: transient MGUS 20 cases. Time to disappearance 2,6 months (1,4-4,6). Evolution to malignant gammopathy 24 cases, time to progression 3 years (IC 1,82-4,3).Results. Several factors were associatedçwith malignant transformation: heavy chain IgA (p < 0,002), ESR (p < 0,001), age < 70 (p < 0,05), bone marrow percentage of plasma cells (p < 0,002) y ostheoporosis (p < 0,005). A MGUS follow up model is suggested


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/epidemiología , Paraproteinemias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Biomarcadores/análisis , Paraproteinemias/fisiopatología , Paraproteínas/aislamiento & purificación , Cadenas Pesadas de Inmunoglobulina/análisis , Osteoporosis/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...